DKU Homepage

Search

IGHE Publications >

Volume 4, April 2026

Moving Beyond Homework

The role of asynchronous education in learning

Author: ANDREW W. MACDONALD

DOI: 

View PDF

Executive Summary

Structured asynchronous learning, defined as purposeful, out-of-class activities, demonstrates significant potential for enhancing student achievement, engagement, and satisfaction, particularly when contrasted with traditional homework assignments. While meta-analyses on blended learning show mixed results on overall achievement, they consistently support that positive outcomes are highly dependent on the quality of pedagogical design.

From the research, effective practices include structuring activities to engage the full Kolb learning cycle, incorporating high-quality multimedia, promoting metacognition, and ensuring timely, actionable feedback.

Successful adoption is constrained primarily by administrative and faculty-side challenges, chiefly the perception of increased instructor workload and the requisite need for professional development, alongside managing heterogeneous student comfort with technology. The evidence concludes that intentional design of out-of-class time is a critical mechanism for improving educational outcomes.

Summary of Best Practices

Metacognition

Thoughtful inclusion of self-reflection opportunities is key

Social Interaction

Opportunities for students to seek faculty and classmate interaction to overcome key moments of learning difficulty

Multimedia

Small, chunked videos and content allow for self-paced learning

Implementation

Important to provide training and resources to faculty and students

KEYWORDS:
Asynchronous Learning
Metacognition
Meta-analysis

References

  1. Ang, Jayden Wei Jie, Yin Ni Ng, Lynette Hui-Wen Lee, and Jia Ying Yong. 2024. “Exploring Students’ Learning Experience and Engagement in Asynchronous Learning Using the Community of Inquiry Framework through Educational Design Research.” Education Sciences 14 (3): 215. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14030215.
  2. Anthony, Bokolo, Adzhar Kamaludin, Awanis Romli, Anis Farihan Mat Raffei, Danakorn Nincarean A. L. Eh Phon, Aziman Abdullah, and Gan Leong Ming. 2022. “Blended Learning Adoption and Implementation in Higher Education: A Theoretical and Systematic Review.” Technology, Knowledge and Learning 27 (2): 531–78. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-020-09477-z.
  3. Anthony Jnr., Bokolo. 2022. “An Exploratory Study on Academic Staff Perception towards Blended Learning in Higher Education.” Education and Information Technologies 27 (3): 3107–33. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10705-x.
  4. Ashraf, Muhammad Azeem, Meijia Yang, Yufeng Zhang, Mouna Denden, Ahmed Tlili, Jiayi Liu, Ronghuai Huang, and Daniel Burgos. 2021. “A Systematic Review of Systematic Reviews on Blended Learning: Trends, Gaps and Future Directions.” Psychology Research and Behavior Management 14 (null): 1525–41. https://doi.org/10.2147/PRBM.S331741.
  5. Babcock, Philip, and Mindy Marks. 2010. “Leisure College, USA: The Decline in Student Study Time. Education Outlook. No. 7.” American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED511233.
  6. Bjork, Robert A., and Elizabeth L. Bjork. 2020. “Desirable Difficulties in Theory and Practice.” Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition 9 (4): 475–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jarmac.2020.09.003.
  7. Cao, Wenwen. 2023. “A Meta-Analysis of Effects of Blended Learning on Performance, Attitude, Achievement, and Engagement across Different Countries.” Frontiers in Psychology 14 (July). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1212056.
  8. Demirtaş, Burak Kağan, and Umut Türk. 2022. “Student Performance under Asynchronous and Synchronous Methods in Distance Education: A Quasi-Field Experiment.” International Review of Economics Education 41 (November):100244. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iree.2022.100244.
  9. Fabriz, Sabine, Julia Mendzheritskaya, and Sebastian Stehle. 2021. “Impact of Synchronous and Asynchronous Settings of Online Teaching and Learning in Higher Education on Students’ Learning Experience During COVID-19.” Frontiers in Psychology 12 (October). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.733554.
  10. Fernandez, Cassandra Jane, Rachana Ramesh, and Anand Shankar Raja Manivannan. 2022. “Synchronous Learning and Asynchronous Learning during COVID-19 Pandemic: A Case Study in India.” Asian Association of Open Universities Journal 17 (1): 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1108/AAOUJ-02-2021-0027.
  11. Hattie, John, and Helen Timperley. 2007. “The Power of Feedback.” Review of Educational Research 77 (1): 81–112. https://doi.org/10.3102/003465430298487.
  12. Hess, Frederik M., and Greg Fournier. 2025. “What Do College Students Do All Day? The Answer Isn’t Studying.” Manhattan Institute. https://manhattan.institute/article/what-do-college-students-do-all-day-the-answer-isnt-studying.
  13. Hill, John, and Karen Smith. 2023. “Visions of Blended Learning: Identifying the Challenges and Opportunities in Shaping Institutional Approaches to Blended Learning in Higher Education.” Technology, Pedagogy and Education, May. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/1475939X.2023.2176916.
  14. Hiltz, Starr Roxanne, and Barry Wellman. 1997. “Asynchronous Learning Networks as a Virtual Classroom.” Commun. ACM 40 (9): 44–49. https://doi.org/10.1145/260750.260764.
  15. Kolb, Alice Y., and David A. Kolb. 2009. “The Learning Way: Meta-Cognitive Aspects of Experiential Learning.” Simulation & Gaming 40 (3): 297–327. https://doi.org/10.1177/1046878108325713.
  16. Le, Thi Nguyet, Bill Allen, and Nicola F Johnson. 2022. “Blended Learning: Barriers and Drawbacks for English Language Lecturers at Vietnamese Universities.” E-Learning and Digital Media 19 (2): 225–39. https://doi.org/10.1177/20427530211048235.
  17. Müller, Claude, and Thoralf Mildenberger. 2021. “Facilitating Flexible Learning by Replacing Classroom Time with an Online Learning Environment: A Systematic Review of Blended Learning in Higher Education.” Educational Research Review 34 (November):100394. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2021.100394.
  18. Müller, Claude, Thoralf Mildenberger, and Daniel Steingruber. 2023. “Learning Effectiveness of a Flexible Learning Study Programme in a Blended Learning Design: Why Are Some Courses More Effective than Others?” International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education 20 (1): 10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-022-00379-x.
  19. Murphy, Dillon H, Robert A Bjork, and Elizabeth L Bjork. 2023. “Going beyond the Spacing Effect: Does It Matter How Time on a Task Is Distributed?” Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 76 (5): 1131–54. https://doi.org/10.1177/17470218221113933.
  20. Radovan, Marko, Ema Meden, and Danijela Makovec Radovan. 2024. “The Predictive Power of Teaching Approaches: Unveiling Keys to Enhanced Students’ Motivation and Workload in Blended Learning.” Ubiquity Proceedings 4 (1). https://doi.org/10.5334/uproc.148.
  21. Ravizza, Susan M., Nathan L. Meram, and David Z. Hambrick. 2023. “Synchronous or Asynchronous Learning: Personality and Online Course Format.” Personality and Individual Differences 207 (June):112149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2023.112149.
  22. Schreiber, William B. 2022. “Teaching in a Pandemic: Adapting Preparations for Asynchronous Remote Learning Using Three Evidence-Based Practices.” Scholarship of Teaching and Learning in Psychology 8 (2): 106–12. https://doi.org/10.1037/stl0000208.
  23. Shlomo, Amit, and Rinat B. Rosenberg-Kima. 2025. “F2F, Zoom, or Asynchronous Learning? Higher Education Students’ Preferences and Perceived Benefits and Pitfalls.” International Journal of Science Education 47 (8): 1002–27. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2024.2355673.
  24. Tanner, Kimberly D. 2012. “Promoting Student Metacognition.” CBE—Life Sciences Education 11 (2): 113–20. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.12-03-0033.
  25. Vaca-Cárdenas, Mónica Elva, Ermenson Ricardo Ordonez-Avila, Leticia Azucena Vaca- Cárdenas, and Antoni Neptalí Vaca-Cárdenas. 2024. “Students’ Acceptance toward Asynchronous Virtual Education during COVID-19 Pandemic.” Kasetsart Journal of Social Sciences 45 (2): 483–92.
  26. Varkey, Thomas Chandy, John A. Varkey, Jack B. Ding, Philip K. Varkey, Colton Zeitler, Anne M. Nguyen, Zachary I. Merhavy, and Charles Ryan Thomas. 2022. “Asynchronous Learning: A General Review of Best Practices for the 21st Century.” Journal of Research in Innovative Teaching & Learning 16 (1): 4–16. https://doi.org/10.1108/JRIT-06-2022-0036.
  27. Veenman, Marcel V. J., Bernadette H. A. M. Van Hout-Wolters, and Peter Afflerbach. 2006. “Metacognition and Learning: Conceptual and Methodological Considerations.” Metacognition and Learning 1 (1): 3–14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-006-6893-0.
  28. Wagner, Laura K., Simon Schindler, and Marc-André Reinhard. 2017. “The Positive Facet of Self-Compassion Predicts Self-Reported Use of and Attitudes toward Desirable Difficulties in Learning.” Frontiers in Psychology 8 (August). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01353.
  29. Walsh, James D. 2025. “Everyone Is Cheating Their Way Through College.” New York Magazine. May 7, 2025. https://nymag.com/intelligencer/article/openai-chatgpt-ai-cheating-education-college-students-school.html.
  30. Wu, Lan, and Jung S. You. 2022. “Synchronous or Asynchronous Course: Business Students’ Perspectives on an Optimized Modality of Online Teaching and Learning.” Journal of Marketing Education 44 (2): 265–84. https://doi.org/10.1177/02734753221093740.
  31. Yang, Hongyan, and Enilda Romero-Hall. 2024. “A Pilot Study Exploring Interaction and Student Satisfaction in Asynchronous Courses in Higher Education.” TechTrends 68 (4): 761–70. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-024-00986-7.
  32. Yu, Qing, Bao-min Li, and Qi-yun Wang. 2024. “The Effectiveness of 3D Holographic Technology on Students’ Learning Performance: A Meta-Analysis.” Interactive Learning Environments 32 (5): 1629–41. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2022.2124424.
  33. Yu, Qing, Yu ,Kun, Li ,Baomin, and Qiyun and Wang. 2025. “Effectiveness of Blended Learning on Students’ Learning Performance: A Meta-Analysis.” Journal of Research on Technology in Education 57 (3): 499–520. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2023.2264984.